The Life-wave and the Seven Elements. The Esoteric Philosophy as Taught by the Stoics.

Among the doctrines of Stoicism was that of the genesis or birth of the elements of the kosmos. Five were spoken of, and two more were vaguely hinted at. The five were aether, beginning with the highest; then what was called fire; then air; then water; and then earth. Now these kosmical elements are not the familiar things which we know by those names, for they were taken merely to symbolize, through certain appropriate qualities which they possess, the actual elements of kosmical being.

These elements of nature, which the Brahmanical philosophy called the tattwas, may likewise be called the principles of kosmos, precisely as man's seven principles may be called the elements of his being. We can say the elements of kosmos, or the principles of kosmos, and it means for present purposes the same thing; and we may say the elements of man or the principles of man, and it means for present purposes precisely the same thing. Seven different qualities or states or conditions of prakriti or nature — call it also substance or matter for the present, if you like. The present is not an appropriate time to go into a too detailed distinction of the difference — which does exist — between matter and prakriti. At any rate, the elements are seven different states or conditions or qualities of prakriti, the manifested side of kosmical being.

These seven elements or principles — five, as openly taught — according to the Stoic philosophy were derived one from the other, in order as follows: first, the Nameless One; second, its progeny or offspring or child, which is the second element lower in the scale; the third was aether, the progeny or offspring of the second, combining in itself, at the same time, the qualities or powers of the second, its parent, and of the first, its grandparent, so to say. Then came fire, containing in itself the elements of the three preceding, and also its own particular swabhava or essential characteristic. You will remember what swabhava means: the particularity, the essential nature, the real characteristic, of a thing, which makes it different from some other thing. The swabhava of a rose makes the rose plant bring forth a rose always, and not a lily or a violet; and the swabhava of a man brings forth as offspring a man always and not a gooseberry or an acorn. This is swabhava, or self-nature. Call it the essential individuality, if you like; it is the special or germinal individuality.

Then from fire, as a parent, sprang air. We are using these familiar terms, with a warning, as said before, that they do not really mean the familiar material things which we know by those names. However, this element called air contains in itself the qualities of its own nature, likewise those of fire, its parent, and of aether, its grandparent, and the qualities of the second and the first elements as well. Then comes water, containing in itself its own qualities and also the qualities of the five which precede it. Finally comes the seventh or last, gross matter, or concreted substance, containing in itself the qualities of all the six which precede it; each element giving birth to each following one as the life-wave ran its course down the shadowy arc of manifestation, or the building of the framework of the kosmos.


Copyright © 1979 by Theosophical University Press. All rights reserved.

Polar Shift Converges With Shift In Astrological Age To Usher In The Age Of Virgo Rather Than Aquarius

A man ahead of his time, much like myself.

the following is a section from Graham Hancock's Finger Prints of The Gods which I have expanded upon to illustrate my take on this extraordinary point in time and space that we are all currently experiencing.

The late Charles Hapgood taught the history of science at Keene College,
New Hampshire, USA. He wasn’t a geologist, or an ancient historian. It is
possible, however, that future generations will remember him as the man
whose work undermined the foundations of world history—and a large
chunk of world geology as well.

Albert Einstein was among the first to realize this when he took the
unprecedented step of contributing the foreword to a book Hapgood
wrote in 1953, some years before he began his investigation of the Piri
Reis Map:

I frequently receive communications from people who wish to consult me
concerning their unpublished ideas [Einstein observed]. It goes without saying that
these ideas are very seldom possessed of scientific validity. The very first
communication, however, that I received from Mr. Hapgood electrified me. His
idea is original, of great simplicity, and—if it continues to prove itself—of great
importance to everything that is related to the history of the earth’s surface.14

The ‘idea’ expressed in Hapgood’s 1953 book is a global geological
theory which elegantly explains how and why large parts of Antarctica
could have remained ice-free until 4000 BC, together with many other
anomalies of earth science. In brief the argument is:

1 Antarctica was not always covered with ice and was at one time much
warmer than it is today.

2 It was warm because it was not physically located at the South Pole in
that period. Instead it was approximately 2000 miles farther north.
This ‘would have put it outside the Antarctic Circle in a temperate or
cold temperate climate.

3 The continent moved to its present position inside the Antarctic Circle
as a result of a mechanism known as ‘earth-crust displacement’. This
mechanism, in no sense to be confused with plate-tectonics or
‘continental drift’, is one whereby the lithosphere, the whole outer
crust of the earth, ‘may be displaced at times, moving over the soft
inner body, much as the skin of an orange, if it were loose, might shift
over the inner part of the orange all in one piece.

4 During the envisaged southwards movement of Antarctica brought
about by earth-crust displacement, the continent would gradually have
grown colder, an ice-cap forming and remorselessly expanding over
several thousands of years until it attained its present dimensions.’17

Further details of the evidence supporting these radical proposals are
set out in Part VIII of this book. Orthodox geologists, however, remain
reluctant to accept Hapgood’s theory (although none has succeeded in
proving it incorrect). It raises many questions.
Of these by far the most important is: what conceivable mechanism
would be able to exert sufficient thrust on the lithosphere to precipitate a
phenomenon of such magnitude as a crustal displacement?
We have no better guide than Einstein to summarize Hapgood’s
findings:

In a polar region there is continual deposition of ice, which is not symmetrically
distributed about the pole. The earth’s rotation acts on these unsymmetrically
deposited masses, and produces centrifugal momentum that is transmitted to the
rigid crust of the earth. The constantly increasing centrifugal momentum
produced in this way will, when it has reached a certain point, produce a
movement of the earth’s crust over the rest of the earth’s body.

The Piri Reis Map seems to contain surprising collateral evidence in
support of the thesis of a geologically recent glaciation of parts of
Antarctica following a sudden southward displacement of the earth’s
crust. Moreover since such a map could only have been drawn prior to
4000 BC, its implications for the history of human civilization are
staggering. Prior to 4000 BC there are supposed to have been no
civilizations at all.

At some risk of over-simplification, the academic consensus is broadly:

-Civilization first developed in the Fertile Crescent of the Middle East.

-This development began after 4000 BC, and culminated in the
emergence of the earliest true civilizations (Sumer and Egypt) around
3000 BC, soon followed by the Indus Valley and China.

-About 1500 years later, civilization took off spontaneously and
independently in the Americas.

-Since 3000 BC in the Old World (and about 1500 BC in the New)
civilization has steadily ‘evolved’ in the direction of ever more refined,
complex and productive forms.

-In consequence, and particularly by comparison with ourselves, all
ancient civilizations (and all their works) are to be understood as
essentially primitive

(the Sumerian astronomers regarded the heavens with unscientific awe, and even the pyramids of Egypt were built by technological primitives’).

The evidence of the Piri Reis Map appears to contradict all this.

Piri Reis and his sources

In his day, Piri Reis was a well-known figure; his historical identity is
firmly established. An admiral in the navy of the Ottoman Turks, he was
involved, often on the winning side, in numerous sea battles around the
mid-sixteenth century. He was, in addition, considered an expert on the
lands of the Mediterranean, and was the author of a famous sailing book,
the Kitabi Bahriye, which provided a comprehensive description of the
coasts, harbours, currents, shallows, landing places, bays and straits of
the Aegean and Mediterranean Seas. Despite this illustrious career he fell
foul of his masters and was beheaded in AD 1554 or 1555.19

The source maps Piri Reis used to draw up his 1513 map were in all
probability lodged originally in the Imperial Library at Constantinople, to
which the admiral is known to have enjoyed privileged access. Those
sources (which may have been transferred or copied from even more
ancient centres of learning) no longer exist, or, at any rate, have not been
found. It was, however, in the library of the old Imperial Palace at
Constantinople that the Piri Reis Map was rediscovered, painted on a
gazelle skin and rolled up on a dusty shelf, as recently as 1929.

Graham Hancock – FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS


My thoughts on the matter:

In a section of my book "The Killer Inside" I attempt to take the Hapgood findings one step further and argue that the once temperate region now covered by a sheet of ice over a mile thick was always in its physical location but that the location of the poles themselves shifted.

Additionally I would like to put forth the theory that the rapid melting of these very same caps today are not a bi product of "global warming" but rather evidence of the poles becoming active in preparation of yet another shift.

According to Mayan astrological mysticism this event occurs every 13,000 years or twice within the context of a Galactic Cycle lasting 26,200 years in duration.

In his book "The Mayan Factor" Jose Arguelles compares this Grand Cycle to a Galactic Marathon. The ice caps were argued to manifest around 10,000 BC but no later than 13,000 BC which would have been just at 13,000 years ago. My calculations have the actual event occurring in the year 11,086 BC. It was at this exact time that the age shifted from Aquarius to Leo and only because our position in relation to the black holed sun reversed its polarity. The procession then proceeded counter clockwise which is in direct opposition to our monthly calender today.

If the polarity were not reversing once more at the end of the year we would indeed be ushering the Age of Aquarius right now. However, since the polarity is reversing we will be trending into the opposite sign of which ever sign is in predominance at the time of the shift. Currently we are still in Pisces while trending into Aquarius at an equal rate to the reversal of our own polarity. This being said we are also being influenced by Virgo as well as Leo since its the opposite of Aquarius. There will come a moment soon that all four signs will have some influence before we in fact trend away from Aquarius and Leo and settle into the Age of Virgo for the next 2,183 years.

The physical manifestations of this incredible astrological event are already playing our in our internal structures. all of us were born with inherent attributes commonly accepted within our elemental star sign. As we slowly reverse polarity, we have began to take on the attributes of our polar opposite star sign. For example, if you were born a Sagittarius you would be slowly and subtly be taking on the viewpoint and elemental expression characteristics of a Gemini, Taurus to Scorpio, Virgo to Pisces, Capricorn to Cancer and so on and so forth. Additionally, due to the double affect produced by the shift in ages we would also be expanding our viewpoint further.

An even more startling discovery for you folks at home:

In my book I also explain that this is the exact reason why the astrological ages have been proceeding in a counter clockwise direction since that point. We are currently in the Age of Pisces which began around 170 BC and assumed total influence around the time of Jesus who ushered in the era of religion, spirituality and the God question which are in fact all Pisces characteristics.

Before that was the Age of Aries. The Arian Age ushered in Roman conquests and war of honor and outright supremacy which are inherent qualities of the War planet otherwise known as Mars. Taurus began in 4,480 BC and brought the Torah. The Age of Gemini before that, then Cancer, and finally Leo which came into existence after the last polar shift around 11,086 BC. Up to that point in the current Grand cycle the procession of the astrological ages were proceeding in a clockwise manor. The Age of Aquarius was the last of the clockwise ages leading up to the polar shift.

I will have a much more comprehensive explanation and correlating broad picture analysis of many small and seemingly unrelated parts of our progressive evolution such as corresponding feminine or masculine energies of predominance playing out in the matriarchal or patriarchal systems of social dominance as well as my explanation of Direct Current and Alternating Current Consciousness.

Stay tuned and thanks for considering seriously the information I have laid out before you this evening.

Best,

Robert Gray Gallagher

COPYRIGHT 2012 RETROCOLLECTIVE PUBLISHING GROUP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

INTRODUCTION "A MAN AHEAD OF HIS TIME" CREDITS GRAHAM HANCOCK FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.

Sacred Geometrical Base

Pisces_Virgo Co Collaboration

Virgoian Age Diamond

"Total Cause Being" to "Total Effect Self"

Copyright Retrocollective Publishing Group 2012 All Rights Reserved.

Robert Gray Gallagher

VIRGOIAN AGE TONE SCALE OF HUMAN CONSCIOUSNESS BY Robert Gray Gallagher

Copyright Retrocollective Publishing Group 2012 All Rights Reserved.

Robert Gray Gallagher

The Handbook Of Human Ownership

Watch this informative 2 hour video on human ownership

Ionic Pinball Wizard

Ionic pinball wizard ROBERT GRAY GALLAGHER, CHARLIE SHEEN, BRITTNEY SPEARS, JFK ASSASSINATION, RON PAUL, PLAYOFFS, FOX NEWS, LINDSEY LOHAN, HOLLYWOOD YOUTH HOSTILES, LOS ANGELES AREA REHABS

We are almost like billions of little ions all bouncing off of one another. Our two separate spheres of influence come together for a moment in time. Our own individual energy fields will actually share and experience that will either contribute to one another’s life in a positive or negative way. Then those two ions will separate from one another and individually set course towards their next fateful interaction.

This is not to say that ever single interaction in our life is fateful in nature. This is just to say, from my own experience, that the interactions that have shaped my collective experience have all seemed to happen for a reason.

Most of my life I was just way too self obsessed to notice the significance of these interactions until much later on. Life almost seemed like one gigantic game of pinball. There are defiantly subtle forces at work that drive our subconscious to do certain things at certain points in our life.

In my opinion these are not just random experiences that we have with one another as we careen along our journey. There is both rhyme and reason for the encounters that we experience. Of course these interactions are always susceptible to human error. You remember what that is right? I define human error as our ability to exercise fear driven free will. Fear driven free will to me seems like a will that is working independently from that of the universe. Free will, in my experience, has been dictated by my instincts that have become out of calibration with my spirit.

My life became a frustrating cycle of reoccurring situations that I perceived as events that were happening to me. Why is this happening to me? I would ask myself this question with increasing regularity, as I became more spiritually off kilter. Now I see that what ever I put out into the universe will come back to me. My external perception will only be as comfortable as my inner self will allow it to be.

The problem with me was that I had little or no idea that I was off balance and was taking actions on a daily basis to make matters worse. Self-centered thinking, for me, is an obsession. If I become obsessed with myself then I become disconnected from my higher self and the integrity of my vibration becomes inconsistent as a result.

If we want to run around dehumanizing each other to be able to excuse our self centered behavior then we might as well dehumanize ourselves for a minute to prove a point. What if we were all either positive or coming from a place of spiritual love or negative charged who are driven by their fears. Depending on if we are in our proper integrity and connected to our higher self or not, we will either be conscious or unconscious to the way that we affect the other ions that we come into contact with.

Now try to stand back and look at all of the people on the planet without shape and forum but rather as spheres of energy like protons and electrons. Next try to picture eight billion negative or positively charged ions all interacting with one another. Now let’s also try to imagine that all of these ions behaviors were dictated by the other ions instead of by the laws of the atom that contain them.
Sure there are scientific laws that dictate the combining of any elements together but far too often these laws would only dictate the basic nature the ions. In humanities case ions have become manipulated by other ions.

The more negative reactions that occur from these fateful interactions, the more negative the collective vibration of all these ions will become. The more that we live in selfish imagined fear and project that fear on to those around us, the more negative our collective vibration will become. Each and every time that we act out on our imagined fears in the form of our character liabilities we are subtracting from the collective potential experience we could have together.
Like I said, we cannot ever destroy the truth. We can only make it increasingly harder to see. My higher consciousness is my connection to truth. How connected are you to your own higher consciousness? As long as I have remained invested in maintaining my fear driven yet creative ego projection I have continued to get what I have always gotten.